Search for: "Morris v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 2,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
In a similar line, in Shelly Morris Business Services Ltd. v Syncor Solutions Limited,[8]Shelly Morris Business Services Ltd. v Syncor Solutions Limited, 2020 BCSC 2038 (“Shelly Morris”). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The defendant/appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the High Court of Cross Rivers State, and asked for a stay of proceedings on the basis that there was an exclusive choice of court agreement in favour of England. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
Business and human rights: Governance challenges in an era of transition Panellists include Professor Lorna McGregor (University of Essex), Professor Morris Altman (University of Dundee), Dr Axel Marx (University of Leuven), Professor Brigit Toebes (University of Groningen) and Dr Gale Raj-Reichert (Bard College Berlin). [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Further, it castigated the RCMP, stating, “There is also a disquieting fact that, on the record before us, it seems that the authorities were much quicker to intervene to protect Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
To evaluate this argument the Judge first assessed the current state of the UK market. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Schoolman v McAuliffe 2020 NY Slip Op 34228(U) December 21, 2020 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 4311/2019 Judge: Sanford Neil Berland we see: “This action arises out of three petitions initially brought under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code by. respectively. by 1 lampton Transportation Ventures. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 9:07 am by Sam Turco
Overcharging is not in itself usury The Michigan bankruptcy court confronted this issue in the case of Allen-Morris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  However, "expedition will only be justified on the basis of real, objectively viewed urgency" and "commercial certainty needs to be evaluated in its proper context" (James Petter v EMC Europe [2015] EWCA Civ 480).In the context of expedition of patent trials to avoid the German injunction gap, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) in Nicoventures Trading Limited v Philip Morris & or [2020] EWHC 1594 added three points to… [read post]