Search for: "Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd." Results 101 - 120 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am by Giesela Ruehl
It also refers to the laws enacted on a national level in Germany which are a consequence of the new European instruments. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:34 am by James Hamilton
National Australia Bank, Ltd, the Supreme Court ruled that Rule 10b-5 does not provide a cause of action to foreign plaintiffs suing foreign and US defendants for misconduct in connection with securities traded on foreign exchanges since the antifraud rule reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on a US exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the US.Professor Pan… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
National Australia Bank Redux: The potentially even greater impact to international practice of the “other” holding of Morrison: the judicial power to hear a case vs. whether the statute applies to the challenged conduct. (3) In International Litigation, A Closed U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:58 am by Louis M. Solomon
National Australia Bank Redux: The potentially even greater impact to international practice of the “other” holding of Morrison: the judicial power to hear a case vs. whether the statute applies to the challenged conduct. (3) In International Litigation, A Closed U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Jenna Greene
National Australia Bank Ltd. held that the Exchange Act does not have any extraterritorial effect, O’Connor stressed. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm by Charles Kotuby
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. __ (June 24, 2010), pulling back the extraterritorial effect of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:50 pm by Jay D. Dean
National Australia Bank Ltd does not strip investors in US companies who purchased their shares overseas of securities fraud protections under US law if the shares were dual listed, say Israel’s securities regulation authority and a group of Israeli investors. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm by James Hamilton
National Australia Bank, Ltd. should remain in force or, instead, be overridden to allow such private securities fraud actions. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
National Australia Bank Ltd., a US Supreme Court decision that was issued two months after the SEC filed charges against him. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:55 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
National Australia Bank Ltd., the Supreme Court reaffirmed a strict presumption against the extraterritorial application of federal statutes on the ground that the presumption provides “a stable background against which Congress can legislate with predictable effects. [read post]