Search for: "Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2006, 9:09 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003) and lays to rest a number of... [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 5:40 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc. case and served on, inter alia, the INTA's Drafting Committee for Revisions to FTDA. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 434 (2003).Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: What do you think? [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:18 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 433 (2003), where the Court held that the federal dilution statute required a showing of actual dilution. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm by Tom Casagrande
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003)), contains no such requirement, providing only that the courts assess only "the degree of similarity. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:22 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 433 (2003), which had construed the FTDA to require a showing of actual dilution, as opposed to likelihood of dilution. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 2:07 am by Brent Lorentz
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., where Victoria's Secret sued an individual, named Victor Moseley, who was operating an adult store under the name Victor's Little Secret. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm by Michael Atkins
Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), which required a showing of “actual dilution”]. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am by Ron Coleman
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 434 (2003). [read post]