Search for: "Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 432 (2003). [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:36 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003). [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 434 (2003). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 434 (2003).Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: What do you think? [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:09 am
See, e.g., Moseley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:44 pm
V Secret Catalogue Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), which required a showing of “actual dilution”]. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), the adoption by Congress of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act ("FTDA"), and the more recent TDRA. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:44 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:07 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 2:07 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., where Victoria's Secret sued an individual, named Victor Moseley, who was operating an adult store under the name Victor's Little Secret. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003)), contains no such requirement, providing only that the courts assess only "the degree of similarity. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:26 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003). [read post]
30 May 2008, 5:08 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:18 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 433 (2003), where the Court held that the federal dilution statute required a showing of actual dilution. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 5:40 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc. case and served on, inter alia, the INTA's Drafting Committee for Revisions to FTDA. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:01 am
” See Victoria’s Secret Catalogue, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 9:19 pm
Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 433 (2003). [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:22 pm
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 433 (2003), which had construed the FTDA to require a showing of actual dilution, as opposed to likelihood of dilution. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Moseley v. [read post]