Search for: "Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Co." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
On July 26, 2000, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
 The Brussels offering was a consultation on two things, the role of the publisher and the "panorama" right, and the IPOs a further consultation and technical review "on changes to Section 72 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (which permits the free public showing or playing of a film contained in a broadcast). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See also Motion Picture Patents Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The “Sister Wives” family challenged the law (represented by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley), and a federal district court in Utah struck the law down on free exercise clause grounds, largely reasoning that the law was motivated by hostility to polygamist Mormons. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Films, Inc., 542 F.3d 1007 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indivisibility theory made it hard for copyright owners to sell different use privileges to different people in different markets: serial publication v. motion picture. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
In 1916, the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania entered a decree against the Motion Picture Patents Co. [read post]