Search for: "Motley v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Va. 1999) (granting motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim); Perry v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
In Solak v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am
We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
In 1985, Castleman received a doctorate degree, with the assistance of a Ron Motley fellowship. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
(Aside for non-lawyers: “diverse” = plaintiff and defendants are citizens of different states; “non-diverse” = citizens of same state on both sides of the “v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
See Gibson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:46 pm
"] In Duval County School Board v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
’” Motley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:42 pm
v=HIO8nI2C8Z8 She’ll Sing For You, part 1 © 2011 by the authors of Popehat. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Julien v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
The appellants are a motley assortment of private individuals and groups. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:06 am
The UK Intellectual Property Office's alerting service has informed the IPKat of the case brought by Spain before the Court of Justice: Case C-274/11 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
