Search for: "Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 8:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Counsel for Motorola Mobility said that his client "might perhaps take a royalty-free license", which is hardly the basis on which Microsoft would settle the case.The official announcement of the Microsoft-Motorola deal referred only to Motorola Solutions, and did not mention Motorola Mobility (the mobile devices company that spun off of the original Motorola corporation and later sold to… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm by Florian Mueller
Here's Google's notice of appeal (click on the image to enlarge or read the text below the image):NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation (collectively, "Motorola"), Defendants and Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants in the above-captioned case, appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) Judgment of the… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
 In relation to EAS, Microsoft in any case had a licence, because Microsoft’s licence from Google in 2009 extended to this patent when it was acquired by Google when Google purchased Motorola Mobility Inc. in 2012. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:06 pm by Alex Gasser
  By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation (collectively, “Motorola”) and the Respondent is Microsoft Corp. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 510 (7th Cir. 1982); see also Princo Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
Microsoft Corp., 499 F.3d 1332, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
  Apple (relating to cellular telephony standards) Microsoft Google (limited to Motorola Mobility patents) 1. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) Apple – Apple asks courts to stay two Motorola Mobility lawsuits until Google has acquired the company (FOSS Patents) Google – Oracle v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
National Football Scouting Inc., the scouting arm of the National Football League lost a copyright case in the US District Court of Tacoma against a Washington State resident, who wrote about its annual scouting reports for a sports-oriented website.Image from here Microsoft has won a U.K. ruling invalidating Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:31 pm by Kelly
(Michael Geist) Contempt of court: Compounding a trademark and copyright breach: 9038-3746 Quebec Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am by Kelly
Motorola (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) (IPmetrics Blog) (Virginia ip Law) CAFC – In re Microsoft: Presence created solely for purposes of litigation does not support venue (Patently-O) (IPBiz) District Court N D Illinois: Attorneys’ fees determination may render patent unenforceable despite earlier dismissal of inequitable conduct claim: Gordon-Darby Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
Keung Tse v. eBay, Inc., et al (Patents Post-Grant) District Court W D Wisconsin: Judge Crabb does away with stand-alone Markman hearings: Dashwire, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
(WHDA) Freescale Semiconductor Inc – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-786) regarding Certain Integrated Circuits (ITC Law Blog) Honeywell International – ALJ Gildea sets target date in Certain GPS Navigation Products (337-TA-783) (ITC Law Blog) Intellectual Ventures – Intellectual Ventures files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices (ITC Law Blog) Intellectual Ventures – Intellectual Ventures sues HP,… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
(WHDA) Freescale Semiconductor Inc – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-786) regarding Certain Integrated Circuits (ITC Law Blog) Honeywell International – ALJ Gildea sets target date in Certain GPS Navigation Products (337-TA-783) (ITC Law Blog) Intellectual Ventures – Intellectual Ventures files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices (ITC Law Blog) Intellectual Ventures – Intellectual Ventures sues HP,… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
Microsoft issue staff with Windows 7 phones (Property, intangible) US Patents – Decisions District Court Delaware – Amazon’s infringing use of One-Click technology didn’t irreparably harm digital identity business sufficient to warrant permanent injunction: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]