Search for: "Motta v. State" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
“Pursuant to CPLR 4111 (c), when the answers on a verdict sheet ‘are inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall require the jury to further consider its answers and verdict or it shall order a new trial,’” wrote the panel, quoting Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 10:44 am by Elliot Setzer
Luis Alfredo Motta Dominguez, et al, Case No. 1:19-CR-20388: Indictment Eastern District of New York United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V An accused person shall not be extradited, under the provisions of this Treaty, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause under the laws of the State asking extradition, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment on account of the punishable act for which extradition is asked. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am by Andrew Hamm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Olivas-Motta v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]