Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause" Results 1 - 20 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 3:07 am
The Federal Rule now states:[u]nless otherwise limited by court order ... [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Petitioner had set forth specific facts that clearly showed that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage would result to the movant before the adverse party could be heard in opposition. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A showing of "good cause" presupposes a showing that public access to the records is likely to harm a compelling interest to the movant. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
MACC Venture Partners, decided by Vice-Chancellor Sam Glasscock III, one of the five members of the Delaware Court of Chancery, discusses this issue in some detail, and I think offers a very good analysis: The road to a temporary restraining order ("TRO") is well-worn; it typically requires only that a movant show a non-frivolous claim of wrongdoing, and resulting threatened imminent irreparable harm, to trigger equity's solicitude. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:55 pm by Andrew Delaney
Amending legal rights and responsibilities also requires that the movant show a change in circumstances, but the burden is lower. [read post]
11 May 2014, 6:37 pm
Therefore, so much of the petitioner's order to show cause in the discovery proceeding as seeks to clone all of the computers at John's Farms is denied at this time, with leave to renew. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that upon the following papers numbered 1 to 41 read on these motions for intervention and preliminary injunction; Order to Show Cause and supporting papers 1-10: 11-20 ; Notice of Cross Motion and supporting papers ; Answering Affidavits and supporting papers 21 - 37 ; Replying Affidavits and supporting papers 38-41 ; Other _; (and after hearing counsel in support and opposed to the motion) it is, Ordered that the within two (2)… [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Rather, the Court requires "significant probative evidence" from the nonmovant in order to dismiss a request for summary judgment supported appropriately by the movant. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:55 pm
Therefore, so much of the petitioner's order to show cause in the discovery proceeding as seeks to clone all of the computers at John's Farms is denied at this time, with leave to renew. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:33 am by Russell Knight
Showing up to a court date for your divorce is intimidating. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
As to the motion, Opposer Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) failed to show good cause for modification of the SPO. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am by Wolfgang Demino
The issue on appeal is whether the movant met the summary judgment burden by establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
And even if the cause of action was time-barred, would the court then still have authority to so rule on the merits? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
And even if the cause of action was time-barred, would the court then still have authority to so rule on the merits? [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 12:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court reversed the motion court's order to the extent appealed from and hold that the motions to quash the subpoenas should have been denied in all respects. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Summary judgment shall only be granted when there are no issues of material fact and the evidence requires the court to direct a judgment in favor of the movant as a matter of law. [read post]