Search for: "Mulkey v. Reitman"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Reviewing the relevant cases that preceded Seattle, specifically Hunter and Reitman v Mulkey (387 U.S. 369, 1967), the plurality opinion explained that those cases involved demonstrated injuries on the basis of race that, by reasons of state encouragement or participation, became more aggravated. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Sotomayor mantra "Race matters" likely to thrill some readers, but it's… imprecise (all 9 Justices agree race matters, disagree on how) — Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Plurality cites 1 of my least fave SCOTUS cases, Reitman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Erickson to Reitman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
Mulkey, where the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
Mulkey, where the U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:24 am
Reitman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 pm
06/30/09 SF Chronicle:In his 06/30/09 order in Perry et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
Reitman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" He briefly discusses Romer v. [read post]
