Search for: "Munaf v. Geren"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Bush (2004), the first case involving detentions at Guantanamo, and in Munaf v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Bush (2004), which gave Guantanamo prisoners the right to challenge their detention in federal court, and in Munaf v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am
The court argued that INS v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:37 am
Geren. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
Geren and Hamdi v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
Geren, “habeas corpus is governed by equitable principles” and “prudential concerns. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Circuit heard oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Geren and Kiyemba v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
But the Supreme Court recently, in Munaf v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:49 am
As readers are likely aware, there has finally been meaningful movement in the case of “John Doe,” an unnamed U.S. citizen who has been detained by the U.S. military in Iraq as an “enemy combatant” since mid-September. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
With respect to ACLU v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
There should be no doubt that the court has jurisdiction in such a case, given John Doe's U.S. citizenship Under Munaf v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:04 am
They focus in particular on the non-refoulement issue, with special attention to the Supreme Court’s 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
It resulted in a 2008 Supreme Court decision—Munaf v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
., v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
" While the status of U.S. operations under multinational command has posed statutory questions about habeas jurisdiction—from Hirota to Munaf v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:35 am
Geren, and its interpretation of treaties, as in Sanchez-Llamas, Abbott v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Whiting), military affairs (Munaf v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm
Omar (with the United States as the petitioner) and No. 66-1666, Munaf v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm
That’s why, in cases like Munaf v. [read post]
