Search for: "Municipal Court v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Thanks to amendments to the New Jersey Spill Act in the summer of 2019, and the superior court, appellate division’s recent decision in NJDEP v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
Also, it is well settled that municipal courts do not have the authority to order injunctive relief. 400 Edgewood, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 pm
Municipal Court (1988) 46 Cal.3d 64.) [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
In Audio Visual Services Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:12 pm
In a previous post (January, 2013), I reported on a Superior Court decision requiring a municipality to honour a drainage agreement from 1953. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
Indiana Municipalities’ Franchise Fee Lawsuit Against Online Video Providers Remanded to State Court
23 Nov 2020, 10:29 am
The federal district court remanded the case to the Marion Superior Court, where it was originally filed. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Preston Hollow Capital LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:19 am
Thus, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:58 am
The Ontario Superior Court has dismissed a claim by a landowner for damages relating to a municipal drain (the "Cazabon Drain") located on the landowner's property. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:45 am
If a defendant believes that the municipal court has made an error in its verdict, they can appeal to the New Jersey Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 11:30 am
Read the decision at: Middlesex Centre (Municipality) v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
Pack v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:29 am
In Everitt v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 11:13 pm
The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division reversed a defendant’s DWI conviction in January 2015 in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:38 pm
The Superior Court of Justice, on a 'broad and purposive' approach to the interpretation of municipal powers, was reluctant to interfere with the decision of Oshawa's council. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:50 pm
The city moved to dismiss.The court found that there is no respondeat superior liability against a municipality under section 1983. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:51 pm
(Maricopa County Superior Court No. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:38 am
It disagreed with the municipal court’s conclusion that the provision granted jurisdiction to the municipal courts only “where a finding of liability had already been adjudicated” and a penalty imposed by an administrative law judge or the Superior Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
The Superior Court, Pierce County, granted summary judgment in favor of city for $48,000. [read post]
