Search for: "Muniz v. UPS" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It pointed out that the alimony covered by the first agreement did not add up to $45,000. [read post]