Search for: "Munoz, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2014, 5:20 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
I a participating on an online symposium on the Munoz and McMath cases at the Union - Mt. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
  This appeal involves a form of fraud rarely seen in day to day litigation. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion on November 14, 2018, in a situation which is going to be rarely seen, but is something for insurance lawyers to know exists. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:53 pm by Legal Profession Prof
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals imposed a three-month suspension of an attorney The Hearing Panel Subcommittee (hereinafter “HPS”) of the West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board (hereinafter “LDB”) recommends sanctions for attorney Alfred Joseph Munoz for violations allegedly committed... [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:25 am by Matt C. Bailey
The Munoz appeal was initiated and prosecuted by a class member who objected to the grant of final approval based on a record he argued was insufficient to determine whether the settlement terms were fair, adequate and reasonable.The Court’s opinion resolves any ambiguity as to whether the decisions in Kullar v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:33 pm by Steven G. Pearl
(August 2, 2010, pub. ordered August 23, 2010) --- Cal.App.4th ---, 2010 WL 2991875, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court order (Los Angeles, J. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:23 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
It remains to be seen whether the District Attorney’s Office will appeal. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:25 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Munoz[6] out of Cumberland County involved a servicemember and their appeal of a permanent custody order. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:00 am by Blogger
The trial court denied both motions and on appeal Munoz reasserts the contentions he made by way of those motions. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:09 am
The COA quickly held that it had jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal, but went on to find that substantial competent evidence supported the suppression order:Neither the State nor Solis-Munoz dispute the essential facts pertaining to the issue of whether the statement was voluntary. [read post]