Search for: "Murphy Oil USA Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2012, 4:31 pm by
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., the judge referred to the doctrine of "res judicata". [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:00 pm by Chicago Overtime Law Center
The winning party does not usually encourage the higher court to reopen their case case, but that’s exactly what Murphy Oil USA Inc. is doing after the Fifth Circuit Court ruled in its favor in a lawsuit against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:21 am by Beth Graham
  In Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 361 NLRB No. 72 (Oct. 28, 2014), a company, Murphy Oil, required an Alabama employee to sign a binding arbitration agreement as a condition of employment. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:14 pm by J. Wylie Donald
In a case of surprising longevity, Comer v Murphy Oil USA, Inc., may finally have been laid to rest. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:42 pm by WIMS
 Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., (WD TN, filed 11/10/2016), says that plaintiff's Jehovah's Witness religion does not celebrate Christmas and prohibits its members from wishing others a Merry Christmas. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:58 am by Jillian R. Orticelli
The Court consolidated the cases, Murphy Oil USA Inc., Epic Systems Corp., and Ernst & Young LLP for oral argument to resolve a circuit spit over whether arbitration […] [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:01 pm by Kate Howard
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 16-307 Issue: Whether arbitration agreements with individual employees that bar them from pursuing work-related claims on a collective or class basis in any forum are prohibited as an unfair labor practice under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Therefore, this case is controlled by the Board’s decision in Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 361 NLRB No. 72 (2014), enf. denied 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015). [read post]