Search for: "Murphy v. Cole"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
See Cole v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
See Cole v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:33 pm
” In 2007, the California Supreme Court held that the hour of additional pay for missed meal or rest breaks is not a penalty but a premium wage that compensates employees (Murphy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Murphy, both of NYU Law School. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
SONGS* ABOUT BOOKS &AUTHORS *and some Monty Python and Beat Poetry Click Here for link to Spotify Playlist Radiohead – 2 + 2 = 5 Deborah Pardes – 7th StepMonty Python – A Book At Bedtime Jason Anderson – A Book Laid On It's BindingAngus & Julia Stone – A Book Like ThisBenny's Head – A Bookish GirlAdam's Plastic Pond – A Brief History of English LiteratureThe Gentle Waves – A Chapter in the Life of MathewTom… [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
O’Hanlan, Robinson & Cole LLP, Stamford, Connecticut, and Michael F. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
In The New York Review of Books, David Cole reviews three recent books on the Roberts Court – Uncertain Justice (by Laurence Tribe and former SCOTUSblog contributor Joshua Matz), In the Balance (by Mark Tushnet), and Scalia (by Bruce Murphy) – and concludes that “what most defines the Roberts Court may be its hostility to courts themselves. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:50 am
Murphy, and has only acted in the best interests of the city,” said David Wolpin, an attorney with Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Cole & Boniske who represents Aventura. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:28 am
See id.; see also Murphy v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:41 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:29 pm
The Court then explained its holding in light of Murphy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:14 pm
The court reconciled two premises that seem to be at odds: (1) that the "premium pay" an employer owes for rest period violations is a "wage" (as the Court had previously held in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:11 pm
" That argument was rooted in the California Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Superior Court (4/12/12) --- Cal.4th ---, was probably the most highly anticipated Supreme Court employment law decision since Murphy v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:45 pm
" The Court then discussed the policies behind overtime pay, split shift premiums, meal period premiums, and the like, quoting extensively from Murphy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
Cal. 2008) (applying Murphy v. [read post]
