Search for: "Murphy v. Cole"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
See United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2011).With regard to meal and rest periods, the Court rejected the employer’s argument that the California Supreme Court’s analysis in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
UPS argued that 218.5 applied because the remedy under section 226.7 constitutes a wage under Murphy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
The Supreme Court did so in the Murphy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
This was finally settled by the California Supreme Court's Murphy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
(C.D.Cal. 2008) 249 F.R.D. 580, 585 (Brown), quoting Murphy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:44 am
In that sense, the opinion reminds me of Murphy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Lazarus; responses by Keith Cole, Mary D. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm
The thrust of the argument in opposition is that Section 226.7 premium wages should be governed by Section 1194, not only because Section 226.7 proscribes a statutorily mandated wage, but also because the California Supreme Court concluded in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
The answer to both questions is no.A few years ago, when we were all waiting for a decision in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
’ ” (Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
” See Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:19 am
(See, e.g., the Murphy v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:49 pm
The ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Richard Bagdasarian, Inc. 2008 WL 888524, one of the penalty/wage cases that was a companion case to Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 C4th 1094, and checked to see if it was still pending. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094]. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
