Search for: "Murphy v. James (INMATE 1)" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Judge James Loken would have held that the state statute violated the commerce clause; Judge Diana Murphy would have held that the statute was pre-empted by the Federal Power Act; and Colloton held that the statute was pre-empted by the Clean Air Act, and also by the Federal Power Act insofar as it banned wholesale sales of electric energy in interstate commerce, but not to the extent that the ban was subject to exceptions. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
More than one in every hundred Americans is now behind bars, the authors advise, and the 50 states are now spending nearly $1 billion apiece, per year, on prisons and prisoners. [read post]