Search for: "Murphy v. Kelly" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kelly, 520 F.3d 848 (8th Cir. 2008) (concurrence) — 520_f.3d_848 Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
On April 1, 2006, Soto and Amaro repeated the scheme at Kelly Power Sports in Danvers, Massachusetts. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
In contrast to the ruling in Johnston, in Matter of Murphy v City of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 35 A.D.3d 319, the court ruled that John J. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Disciplinary charges must sufficiently specific so as to permit the accused to prepare his or her defenseWolfe v Kelly, 2010 NY Slip Op 08847, decided on December 2, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentEric Wolfe, a New York City Police Department detective, was served with disciplinary charges alleging that He was guilty of perjury and the confiscation of drugs and money for personal gain involving Wolfe’s “stopping unidentified individuals in unspecified… [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:03 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff alleged discrimination against him for being a "Moorish-American" by seizing legal petitions.In Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Murphy v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 381 criminal defence lawyer Chris Murphy was awarded damages of Aus$110,000. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Gama Endustri Tesisleri Imalat Montaj AS v Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment [2005] IEHC 119 (22 April 2005) (Kelly J), Cogley v Radio Telifís Eireann [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J) and Murray v Newsgroup Newspapers [2010] IEHC 248 (Irvine J) are all to similar effect. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Kelly NY-20 Kirsten Gillibrand v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:43 am
The court said that the appointing authority was “entitled to discharge a probationary police officer ‘for almost any reason, or for no reason at all' as long as it is not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason," citing Duncan v Kelly, 9 NY3d 1024. [read post]