Search for: "Murphy v. Kuhn"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:17 am
“[T]he issue of whether such additional responsibilities should be recognized and given legal effect is governed by the particular relationship between the parties and is best determined on a case-by-case basis” (Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 272 [1997]). [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:49 am
The burden of establishing such a relationship is on the insured (Murphy v Kuhn, supra at 273). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Servs., Inc., 188 AD3d 624, 626 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 270; MAAD Constr., Inc. v Cavallino Risk Mgt., Inc., 178 AD3d 816, 818). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:47 pm
Exchange, 461 Mich. 1, 10, 597 N.W.2d 47, 52 (1999); Murphy v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Another vacuous response to a methodological challenge under Rule 702 is to label the challenge as “going to the weight, not the admissibility” of the challenged expert witness’s testimony. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
