Search for: "Murphy v. Retirement Board" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
Withdrawing from membership in a New York State public retirement systemRichardson v NYC Employees’ Retirement System, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Gammerman, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]A member of a public retirement system may lose his or her eligibility for significant benefits if he or she decides to withdraw his or her contributions upon leaving public employment. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
Murphy, emeritus of Princeton University. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The state board of retirement rejected his application for accidental disability retirement benefits pursuant to Mass. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:35 am by Doug Cornelius
District Court for the District of Massachusetts held in Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:35 am by Doug Cornelius
District Court for the District of Massachusetts held in Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
Murphy Oil USA, on January 13), National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
See Opinion of Special Board of Review, Office of The Judge Advocate General, Army Service Forces, U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
"In Donato's case, said the court, her allegations had satisfied the test as the comments made concerning her performance were "... so harsh as to be likely to persuade any other school board not to hire [her] as a supervisor. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Eliot Kim
Finally, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines Artemio V. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
Wednesday, December 6 Murphy v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Murphy guests a piece in PatLit on a couple of US Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions on estoppel in America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant patent challenges [Merpel explains: the AIA is a sexy subject, but even sexy subjects have their non-sexy bits: that's where estoppel comes in].Around the weblogs 2. [read post]