Search for: "Murphy v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2021, 10:40 am
Pederson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 1:08 pm
EDT, the National Conference of State Legislatures will host a webinar examining two cases from the 2020 term with significant implications for elections, Brnovich v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 9:44 am
Alders v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 8:13 am
” In Murphy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Jessica L. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
Murphy’s book Administrative Law & Practice is cited in the following article: Jarrett Faber, Kisor v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
In First Call Environmental LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
The following article was written by Matt Murphy and Tommy Murphy of Murphy Law Firm for the Autumn 2020 edition of Trial Trends. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
The following article was written by Matt Murphy of Murphy Law Firm and Kiel Duckworth of Duckworth Law Office for the Summer 2021 edition of Trial Trends. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
TortTalkers may recall a previous Tort Talk post on the case of Cost v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
For example, Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Mast v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
United States, 435 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:31 am
Murphy v. [read post]