Search for: "Murphy v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 2,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The 910 pages of records showed Murphy spent $11,847 on various stadium events, including: $936 at a 2018 Taylor Swift concert, $2,095 at a 2018 USA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Murphy, In Memoriam Thomas Buergenthal (1934–2023) International DecisionsJavier Garcia Olmedo, Zaza Okuashvili v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Israel Law Review, Forthcoming).Cometan, International Religious Rights and Standards (September 23, 2023).Tyler Shannon, Texas Proposition 3: A State Constitutional Response To Restrictions On Religious Gatherings, (55 Texas Tech Law Review 559 (2023)).Colleen Murphy & Lesley M. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the court below (6 F4th 1160 (10th Cir, 2021)), the majority of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Briscoe J, Murphy J concurring; Tymkovich CJ dissenting) held that, although the appellant’s First Amendment rights were engaged, the State satisfied strict scrutiny: Colorado had a compelling interest in ensuring equal access to publicly available goods and services, and no option short of coercing speech could satisfy that interest. [read post]