Search for: "Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc." Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 11:21 pm by The Complex Litigator
  Today, the inscrutable Second Appellate District (Division Eight) held, in United Parcel Service Wage And Hour Cases (February 24, 2011), that fees were not available to a prevailing defendant in such actions. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:53 am by Matt C. Bailey
See United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2011).With regard to meal and rest periods, the Court rejected the employer’s argument that the California Supreme Court’s analysis in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2010 WL 1257931, at *2 (D. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc.Court: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-30854  October 19, 2011 Judge: Stewart Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiff brought suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12102, against defendant for failing to provide a reasonable employment accommodation in consideration of his diabetes. [read post]