Search for: "Murray v. BEJ Minerals"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
Murray v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:48 am
Murray v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:15 pm
Murray v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:54 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:33 pm
And one owner of the land has the right to use the surface of the property and owns one-third of the rights to the "minerals" on the land, whereas another owner owns the right to two-thirds of the "minerals" on the land.So are the fossils "minerals" or not? [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:27 am
In Murray v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 12:39 pm
I discussed last year the Ninth Circuit's opinion about whether dinosaur fossils are "minerals" under relevant legal principles. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:01 am
Dispute over remains of two dinosaurs locked in combat 66 million years ago, lately unearthed in Garfield County, Mont. and extremely valuable, hinges on whether their fossils are “minerals”; Ninth Circuit says they are under Montana law [AP via Molly Brady (“property professor dream hypo”), Murray v. [read post]
