Search for: "Music Choice v. Copyright Royalty Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Last month, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments that raised constitutional questions concerning the Copyright Royalty Board. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
However, it “grandfathered” the existing §802(b)(1) standard for “preexisting subscription services” and preexisting satellite radio services — at the time, these consisted solely of five services: DMX, Music Choice, Muzak, Sirius, and XM (since then, the last two have merged to form Sirius XM Radio). [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Instead, the Copyright Board has awarded only 11.56¢ - that's indeed ¢ and not $ and not a typo - per employee per year or 0.0077, i.e. less than 1%, of what Access Copyright asked for. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 1:53 pm
This ruling is styled Canadian Association of Film Distributors and Exporters v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Music Choice v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
In January, two US Congressmen launched a proposed new statute that had the support of both music copyright owners and music users, in an effort to overhaul of the mechanical royalties system in the US. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In CCH the choice of what to copy was made by the user. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
If the musical work copyright owner is identified and located during that three-year period, the Collective shall pay the accrued royalties and a proportionate share of the interest to the copyright owner. [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:58 am
The disagreement over royalty rates (echoed with Music Canada’s anger over the Copyright Board’s Tariff 8 decision, in which the industry also argued that the rates determined by the independent tribunal were “too low”) is fundamentally a matter of negotiation. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
(Forbes)Here's an update on the Access Copyright Hearing for a Post-Secondary tariff that supposedly was concluded on January 22, 2016.I attended to hear the final oral arguments in Access Copyright’s Post-Secondary tariff hearing at the Copyright Board on Friday, January 22, 2016. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:37 am
The Access Copyright v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:37 am
The Access Copyright v. [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
Marcel Boyer, O.C., who is a frequent music industry expert witness at the Board. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
For example, radio and TV stations that don’t want to restrict themselves to Bach, Mozart and other public domain music may have no practical choice other than to deal with SOCAN. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
It replaced the Copyright Appeal Board which, since 1936, was responsible for the annual review and approval of royalties payable to the performing rights societies for the performance of musical works in Canada. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Google (Forbes Cross-Post) https://t.co/AgfSW0prUe -> Standard of perfection: CRTC’s enforcement of Canada’s anti-spam law https://t.co/zG9O8ilByZ via @CBAnatmag -> Music Publisher Goes for Victory in Trailblazing Piracy Trial https://t.co/fjGoUA8lDM #googlealerts #feedly -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-12-15 https://t.co/RDnE4NjNVK -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-12-15: Copyright protection or amateur art – it's our… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
There was choice. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
Cases about photos of sculpture seemed to make sense when I read them—the copyrightable elements of the photo generally come from the choices made by the photographer, not from the subject matter, and that suggests that the photo isn’t a derivative work of the subject matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Howe: Copyright Board undercompensating artists and depriving rights holders of royalties: Shortly after … http://t.co/eboapuH3lw -> blogged: C.D. [read post]
