Search for: "Myers v. Meyers" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
An order to move would be reasonable for people milling about on the side of the road, but not to Hardy and Myers who were told to stay on the bar ditch and did so.Presiding Judge Keller dissented, along with Meyers, Keasler, and Hervey because the majority failed to view the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court's verdict. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:47 pm by Mark Summerfield
The issue of what, exactly, is ‘implicitly’ disclosed in a prior art reference arises in a decision of a full bench of the Federal Court issued on 23 January 2015 (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v Apotex Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 2) in an appeal relating to a long-running dispute over the validity of a patent covering the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole. [read post]
In so holding, the court determined that the Supreme Court’s ruling in a mass tort action, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
New York dealt with this recently when a federal judge struck down in Alexanxder v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby &… [read post]