Search for: "Myers v. Schneiderman"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
Josefa Velasquez, New York Law Journal *** Full Text of Decision: Myers v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
In his concurring opinion in Myers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:48 am
This reasoning of this morning’s lead opinion in Myers v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:30 am
The right of terminally ill, mentally competent adults to achieve a more peaceful death is at stake in Myers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:30 am
Tucker, AN UNFORTUNATE MISSTEP: THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS' REJECTION OF AID-IN-DYING IN MYERS v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:00 am
He is now a plaintiff in Myers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:50 am
Sara MyersThis morning, the New York Court of Appeals released an 81-page opinion in Myers v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 8:42 am
" The following amicus briefs were submitted to the court in Myers v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
End of Life Choices New York and the End of Life Liberty Project are applauding the ruling by the New York Court of Appeals to hear the appeal in the case of Myers, et. al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
Last week, the highest court in New York heard 50 minutes of oral argument in a case seeking to clarify the legality of medical aid in dying. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:41 am
Schneiderman has raised the possibility that an enforcement action against the energy giant relating to its climate change-related disclosures may be in the works. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
However, “allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration” (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby &… [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am
At the same time, however, “allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration” (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11; Sweeney v Sweeney, 71 AD3d 989, 991). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., et al. v. [read post]
