Search for: "Mylan, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 672
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm by Mark Astarita
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced insider trading charges against Ramkumar Rayapureddy, Chief Information Officer of pharmaceutical company Viatris Inc., which was formerly known as Mylan N.V. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:12 pm by Patent Docs
Patent No. 7,326,708 were either anticipated or rendered obvious by the asserted prior art, in Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 21-1567 [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) earlier today upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision finding that Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. failed to show that certain claims of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) earlier today upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision finding that Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. failed to show that certain claims of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 4:43 am by Melissa Tremblay
  Suzanne prosecuted many notable FCA cases in the government, including several qui tam cases against National Medicare Care, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:10 am by Moll Law Group
Early in July, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. voluntarily recalled a batch of its prefilled Insulin Glargine Injection pens that come in 100 units/mL, 3 mL. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 21-1567, also focuses on the written description requirement – asking what level of disclosure is necessary for a claim limitation requiring a therapeutic treatment to be “effective. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:15 am by Jonathan Stroud
Among those cases, note: Peter Pedersen has continued to add defendants to what promises to be a wide-ranging assertion campaign based on a single patent covering organizing email lists; Samsung has settled a tranche of IPRs against Trenchant Blade Technologies (associated with Tanit Ventures, Inc., with old patents, presumably with a backend, from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation TSMC); Google filed more inter partes reviews (IPRs) against Jawbone (the failed company… [read post]