Search for: "NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co." Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Like other advocacy, advocacy of boycotts is generally constitutionally protected: NAACP v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), the Supreme Court recognized the expressive character of political boycotts, and held unconstitutional a damages award against the NAACP for its role in organizing a boycott of white merchants in Claiborne County, Mississippi. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982))—your suit would be blocked by the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Howard Friedman
Claiborne Hardware Co., concluded that the law infringes plaintiff's free speech rights:Ms. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), the organizers of a boycott of white-owned stores demanded that black customers stop shopping at those stores. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
The court’s landmark decision in NAACP v Claiborne Hardware Co. affirmed the constitutional right of NAACP activists to hold a mass economic boycott of white-owned businesses in Port Gibson, Mississippi, to protest the community’s persistent racial inequality and segregation. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:15 am
And perhaps the high water mark for incitement law is NAACP v. [read post]