Search for: "NAPIER v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 5:43 am
04/14/09 DesMoinesRegister.com:Douglas Napier, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, has written an opinion article, in which he faults the Iowa Supreme Court for holding, in Varnum v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
Napier v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
Some general issues include: taking prosecutor’s lap top back into jury during deliberations to view video statement in criminal case (Napier v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
Some general issues include: taking prosecutor’s lap top back into jury during deliberations to view video statement in criminal case (Napier v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
US v Napier, 463 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir 2006) does not require it. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:29 am
Napier used to come to his conclusions, except by stating that they consider it speculative. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:18 am
” The key disagreement between the parties is whether the Court’s 1926 decision in Napier v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:10 am
The US Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Kurns v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
In a decision that relied heavily on its own past decision in Napier v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm
Instead, it digs up an an 85-year old precedent, Napier v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Vannes KFT v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1466 (20 December 2010) Chester v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1439 (17 December 2010) Autoweld Systems Ltd v Kito Enterprises LLC [2010] EWCA Civ 1469 (17 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 3344 (Ch) (17 December 2010) … [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 3:35 pm
The Supreme Court held that the LIA preempts state claims for injuries by both railroad passengers and rail workers in Napier v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
The Court held that petitioners’ state-law design-defect and failure-to-warn claims fall within the field of locomotive equipment regulation pre-empted by the Locomotive Inspection Act, as that field was defined in Napier v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:07 am
The district court agreed, and the Third Circuit affirmed, invoking the Supreme Court’s holding in Napier v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:20 pm
NSAEFF v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
Supreme Court case of Napier v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am
The Locomotive Inspection Act did not itself contain a preemption clause, but an 85-year-old precedent, Napier v. [read post]
