Search for: "NATION v. HARNESS" Results 1 - 20 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
• ParticipantsThe following may send representatives, without the right to vote and at the charge of their corresponding administrative budgets:- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;- Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe;- European Court of Human Rights;- Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe;- Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe;- Eurimages;- European Audiovisual Observatory;- Committees or other bodies of the Council of… [read post]
Under various Peoples Republic of China (PRC) laws and regulations on employment, several characteristics of individuals are protected from discrimination in employment, such as nationality, race, gender, religious belief and disability (Protected Characteristics). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:27 pm by Amy Howe
In National Rifle Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
Hardin – concern the same issue: Whether “bump stocks,” a device that harnesses a rifle’s recoil to enable it to fire continuously after the trigger is pulled, are a “machinegun,” the possession and sale of which are prohibited by the National Firearms Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
Translation is useful as a communicative means by which internal Chinese policy is appropriately curated for consumption by political collectives (and others) in a form more suitable for their own political predilections and national context. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Unlike the investigations of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes underway before the International Criminal Court (ICC) and various national courts, there is currently no supranational tribunal that can prosecute the Russian leadership for its invasion of Ukraine and annexations of territory. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v. [read post]