Search for: "NATION v. HARNESS" Results 161 - 180 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
  Writing for the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro notes that “[a]dvocates for those with intellectual disabilities are applauding the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
In early October, I wrote about a rule that the Department of Health and Human Services has proposed that would amend the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) to criminalize compensation for providing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) given through apheresis. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am by Dan Ernst
Local actors harnessed the counter-hegemonic potential of law to shape, direct, and contest the American state. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:42 am
Senator McCain added '[a] company that found remarkable success by harnessing American ingenuity and the opportunities afforded by the U.S. economy should not be shifting its profits overseas to avoid the payment of U.S. tax, purposefully depriving the American people of revenue' (statement here). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Seen as principal defining characteristic of national regimes: use-based or registration-based. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
These topics both reveal the imperial nature of expansion and help to explain the difficulties in recognizing it as such.Chief Justice John Marshall famously ruled in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
 001518950 - written in ‘futura’ type and modified graphically), in relation to several classes of goods, including Class 18 (leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins; trunks; valises; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery) and Class 25 (clothing, footwear; headgear). [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
Pursuant to the case of Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, Company-A and Company-B moved for an order compelling further depositions of plaintiffs with regard to immigration status and income tax returns. [read post]