Search for: "NATION v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 46,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2021, 2:52 pm by Immigration Prof
The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild has published an informative advisory on the recent decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:18 am
United States of America) See also : Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:41 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE House of Lords “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State for the Home Department wanted to rely on closed material in a terror-suspect hearing to justify his decision to make a control order, the controlled person [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:13 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE [2009] UKHL 28; [2009] WLR (D) 180 “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State relied on closed material in a hearing under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to justify his decision [...] [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am by sally
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by CivPro Blogger
Wyeth (covered earlier here), which presents the question “whether a preemption provision enacted in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) bars state-law design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:36 am
National Geographic Society II, 97-03924-CV, reversed a separate panel's 2001 opinion, Greenberg v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:10 am
Regina (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Court of Justice of the European Communities “European member states could lawfully provide in their employment legislation for certain kinds of differences in treatment on the ground of age if those differences were objectively [...] [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF: Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE Court of Appeal “While as much information as possible, without imperilling national security, should be disclosed to a person subject to a control order, it was arguable that there was no irreducible minimum the nondisclosure of which would automatically make a trial unfair. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The idea of corporate versus nation-state Suppose the CEO and board of directors of Sony decided that North Korea is responsible for the hacking to which they've been subjected and decided to hit... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:56 am
EN (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; KC (South Africa) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 630; [2009] WLR (D) 213 “The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Specification of Particularly Serious Crimes) Order 2004, which was made under s 72(4)(a) of the 2002 Act and listed a [...] [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:46 am
BA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; PE (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2009] UKSC 7 ; [2009] WLR (D) 344 "A person who had made an asylum claim or a human rights claim within the meaning of s 113(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was [...] [read post]