Search for: "NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Green, University of Mississippi School of Law, has posted Tribes, Nations, States: Our Three Commerce Powers:This Article argues that one aspect of the power to regulate “Commerce with foreign Nations … and with the Indian Tribes” is broader than the power over “Commerce … among the several States. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:43 pm by John W. Arden
National Banks’ “No Fee” Gift Card Ads Could Violate State Consumer LawsThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.In two suits against that TD Bank, N.A. and Commerce Bank, N.A., consumer claims that the banks deceptively advertised “no fee” gift cards in violation of state consumer protection laws were not preempted by the National Bank Act or… [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am by Eugene Volokh
And both courts maintained that the principle that national firms must tailor in-state operations to comply with state law didn't change, for Dormant Commerce Clause purposes, merely because the in-state operations occurred in part on the internet. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
  The court held that a mall proprietor may have stated a claim for relief to the extent it asserted that the National Bank Act preempts the Constitution State attorney general's claims that the proprietor violated state law by charging some kinds of gift card fees. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:27 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Bank National Association and provided a favorable ruling for the employer. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that federal law, not state law, controls the regulation of mortgage lending activity by national banks, even when that is carried on by an operating subsidiary of the bank. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am by Philip Bobbitt
The threat to interstate commerce presented by New York’s attempt at a veto is perhaps even more reminiscent of another first-year case, Gibbons v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
When, however, a plaintiff seeks to recover under the Lanham Act against a foreign national, the Tenth Circuit the plaintiff must show that the defendant’s conduct has a substantial effect on U.S. commerce. [read post]