Search for: "NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2018, 12:26 pm
Deemed Exports It appears that the license denial policy for NS controlled technology will not apply to deemed export licenses for Russian nationals employed by firms in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:41 am
“Commerce among nations should be fair and equitable. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:31 pm
"And it still blurs the line between banking and commerce. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
If they are (as Wilson's study on state R&D tax credits suggests) a zero-sum game in which states or cities are compelled to pay to attract "star scientists," maybe they should be prohibited under the dormant Commerce Clause, as the Sixth Circuit suggested in Cuno v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
Commerce Exchange Bank, 137 F.3d 885, 890 (6th Cir. 1998); see Grupo Dataflux v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
According to the letter: Recently the Chamber of Commerce and the National Rifle Association sent letters to the Senate criticizing S. 2219 and expressing their opposition to the bill. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
Although Congress apparently cannot withdraw the original subject matter jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, it can determine the suability of foreign nations under its power to regulate foreign commerce, as the court held in Verlinden v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
Australian National Bank, where the Supreme Court concluded that, in considering whether conduct that occurs both inside and outside the United States violates a statute without extraterritorial application, the courts should determine whether the conduct that is the “focus of congressional concern” occurred inside or outside the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:15 pm
The statute states in relevant part: (a) Offense against a national of the United States or within the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:24 am
” Carnegie v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
Fort went to federal and state bank regulators with his concerns. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:30 am
Although the law of neutrality allows neutral and belligerent states to engage in neutral commerce, neutral states may choose to prohibit such activity. [read post]
