Search for: "NATIONS v. STONE" Results 21 - 40 of 954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
My colleague Professor Stone characterizes, in his recent post, the five Justices -- who are Roman Catholics -- who were in the majority in Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by JB
Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020)In this book, I've assembled an all-star cast of legal scholars to rewrite the Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm by Jason Mazzone
Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:08 am by Jessie Canon
The University of Pennsylvania Law School, in partnership with the National Constitution Center, announced today the appointment of Richard V. [read post]
On Tuesday, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) issued its much-awaited decision in General Motors, LLC (GM), 369 NLRB No. 127 (2020), in which it held that abusive or inappropriate workplace speech by employees engaged in protected concerted or union activity (PCA) is not protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act) and that employers may discipline workers for engaging in such conduct, provided, the discipline is not shown to be retaliation for… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
It points to defendant Stone’s secret communications with GRU Operative #1, the original purveyor of DNC documents, and Stone’s bragging about ties to Assange. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The EEOC filed suit (Equal  Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Daily Beast, Geoffrey Stone criticizes Monday’s ruling in Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm by John Floyd
Attorneys (AUSAs) filed a Government’s Sentencing Memorandum in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm by Quinta Jurecic
The occasion was a hearing on a motion to dismiss in Cockrum v. [read post]