Search for: "NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 7:12 am by John McFarland
Last month, the court agreed to hear Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation’s appeal in Forest Oil Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:19 am by Luke Hagedorn
Other notable interstate pipelines include those developed by ANR Pipeline Co., Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Co., Mississippi River Transmission Corp., Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co., and Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Maximino Garza, No. 10-0435 October 5, 2011 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
  <> STUDY: Will Switch From Diesel Trucks to Natural Gas Reduce Greenhouse Impact? [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm by John McFarland
Marshall also addresses the proper interpretation of an earlier Supreme Court case of interest to royalty owners, Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
The Proposed Rule is the result of an extended effort by the Department of Interior, through its subagencies BOEM and BSEE to “streamline its evaluation criteria for determining whether oil, gas and sulfur lessees, right-of-use and easement (RUE) grant holders, and pipeline right-of-way grant holders may be required to provide bonds or other security above the prescribed amounts for base bonds to ensure compliance with their Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) obligations,”… [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
On the one hand, we have breathtaking mountains, sweeping shorelines, and landscapes of natural beauty. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
EPA settles with the GATX Corporation for failing to notify authorities after 2008 ammonia release. [read post]
The Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) applied to the City of Tustin (the “City”) for a conditional use permit and design review approval to build a new 32-pump gas station project next to an existing Costco warehouse. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
A three-judge panel of a federal court of appeals recently grappled with these questions and determined that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission—in considering and approving the construction of a natural gas pipeline project—should have considered the eventual burning of natural gas when weighing environmental concerns. [read post]