Search for: "NCAA v. Board of Regents" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2016, 2:45 am by Scott Bomboy
Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, when it ruled against the NCAA in the O’Bannon case. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:01 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: NCAA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Brad Dixon
Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984) did not bless the NCAA amateurism rules as a matter of law. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:15 am by Alden Abbott
Board of Regents (1984) decision) that its highly restrictive “amateurism” rules should be exempt from antitrust review is patently absurd. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by Alden Abbott
Board of Regents (1984) decision) that its highly restrictive “amateurism” rules should be exempt from antitrust review is patently absurd. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:45 am by Cornell Law Library
Board of Regents -- Hunting the shark : the road to NCAA v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
”He referred to NCAA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), in which the Supreme Court applied a “quick look” to a NCAA restriction on each individual college’s right to broadcast their football games. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 101-103 (1984) ("NCAA"). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 101-103 (1984) ("NCAA"). [read post]