Search for: "NELSON v. NELSON" Results 1 - 20 of 2,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In any constitutional law class there, he would have read Marshall’s Marbury v. [read post]
29 May 2025, 2:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Jeffrey v Teevan (2025) EWCC 24 This is the County Court appeal of an order setting aside default judgment and a default costs order. [read post]
28 May 2025, 6:46 pm by Stephen Halbrook
" Alicea was more appropriately cited by Judge Ryan Nelson, dissenting in Duncan v. [read post]
28 May 2025, 7:50 am by Evan George
The story (“Villaraigosa, despite climate credentials, pivots toward oil industry in run for governor,” by Seema Mehta and Laura Nelson) details how he’s received more than $1 million in campaign contributions and other financial support from fossil-fuel interests over the years. [read post]
22 May 2025, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Mediaite (Zachary Leeman) yesterday: "Original Sin" co-author Alex Thompson revealed a Democratic insider told him they were "amazed" at how "easily" the media swallowed "spin" about former President Joe Biden's health…. [read post]
12 May 2025, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Building Better Than Students for Fair Admissions, (April 28, 2025).Nelson Tebbe & Lawrence G. [read post]
8 May 2025, 9:05 pm by Ellie Rudnick
Nelson, Vinson & Elkins Professor at the University of Houston Law Center, argued that courts need clearer guidance to adjudicate religious accommodation claims in the workplace following the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Groff v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 7:21 am by Holly
  Procedural Background to The Proposed Amendment   Judge Schiltz and Professor Capra presented a report to the Advisory Committee on the Evidence Rules (“the Advisory Committee”) about the proposed Rule 801 amendment during the Advisory Committee’s April 19, 2024, meeting in Washington, D.C.[6] On June 4, 2024, the Advisory Committee made minor changes and approved the proposed amendment to Rule 801(d) for public comment.[7] The Committee on Rules of Practice and… [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
One state court held (by a 5–4 vote) that those statutes themselves violate the First Amendment when applied to newspaper reporters or editors.[7] But in AP v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]