Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 41 - 60 of 3,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
A New Jersey woman yesterday filed suit in federal district court against the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission over its refusal to issue her a vanity license plate reading "8THEIST". [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:53 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
The United States Supreme Court issued a major decision on tolling the statute of limitations on state law claims while the case is in federal court which has significant impact on New Jersey employment litigation. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:12 am
MiPro Homes, the Builders League of South Jersey, Inc. and MiPro Homes, L.L.C. has petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the decision issued by the New Jersey State Supreme Court in December. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 10:06 am by Sean Kirby
On February 11, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey expressly adopted the test created by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:46 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
A proposed bill “authorizing the provision of health care services through telemedicine and telehealth” (S291) is now on the desk of the Governor of New Jersey for action. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Stefanie Ramirez
New Jersey has attempted to legalize sports betting since 2011, when voters passed a referendum calling for the state to legalize sports betting. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:32 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
State of New Jersey, the New Jersey Supreme Court provided employers a new defense to sexual harassment claims under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”). [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]