Search for: "NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
Illinois Central Railroad Co., C.A. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  He specifically argued that reciprocity of advantage is not satisfied where the benefits flow to the general public.[20]  The Penn Central majority ruled otherwise: [T]he application of New York City's Landmarks Law has not effected a "taking" of appellants' property. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]