Search for: "NLRB v. Food Store Employees Union" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 10:28 am by Adam Bennett
The decision overruled a 2016 ruling by an NLRB administrative judge that Kroger had illegally barred two nonemployee representatives of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union from petitioning customers in the parking lot of a store in Portsmouth Virginia. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 12:25 pm
 Maybe since, at I type, there's still at least one unionized employee manning the cashier at a nearly-vacant Fresh & Easy store, the appeal isn't technically moot. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
The stores and commissary comprise Hilander Foods, a division of Kroger Foods. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
The judge, noting that this is the second case against the Respondent, found that a broad order was warranted under Hickmont Foods, 242 NLRB 1357 (1979), based on the Respondent's proclivity to violate the Act. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:12 am by Joy Waltemath
According to Miscimarra, the Eighth Circuit in Wal-Mart Stores Inc v NLRB rejected the majority’s interpretation of “solicitation” and its bright-line rule that, unless a union card is in hand, no solicitation occurs—a contention that the majority disputed. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
  The employee was a member of the Union's employee organizing committee, a group of about 105 employees who spoke to co-workers about the Union, distributed literature, and met with union representatives during the campaign. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
At the time of the hearing, FS operated nine stores and employed approximately 500 employees. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Carpenters Union Local No. 1109 v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
"  Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Not headed to Gotham after all: “The RWDSU union was interested in organizing the Whole Foods grocery store workers, a subsidiary owned by Amazon, and they deployed several ‘community based organizations’ (which RWDSU funds) to oppose the Amazon transaction as negotiation leverage. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
In an earlier decision reported at 344 NLRB No. 144 (2005), the Board affirmed the administrative law judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by laying off three named employees and an undetermined number of unnamed employees because of their union activities. [read post]