Search for: "NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp." Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., in 1937, “[f]rom the standpoint of the employee, the law has recognized that he should not be forced into a relationship which may be distasteful to him. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Law, Literature, and Other Performing Arts, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
First, two of the cases cited by the unions — NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp and Amalgamated Utility Workers v Consolidated Edison Co. of New York — involved private employers, so the “right” the court was referring to could not have been constitutional. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]