Search for: "NORTH v. MCDONALD" Results 21 - 40 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
This law comes after an exodus of major western companies, including Starbucks and McDonald’s, while increasing the pressure on those companies, such as IKEA, the largest furniture manufacturer in the world, who have remained in Russia thus far. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:34 am by SHG
But in the Western District of North Caroline, Chief Judge Martin Reidinger had enough. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Professor Kopel one coauthor a law review article with Professor Moody, and presented an empirical study by Moody in an amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Before the Supreme Court's Heller (2008) (D.C. cannot ban handguns) and McDonald v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
Groth, 73, of Charlotte, North Carolina, died February 16, 2021. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The North American voting machine company Dominion has hit Fox News with a $1.6bn defamation lawsuit, accusing the network of spreading election fraud lies in a misguided effort to stop an exodus of enraged viewers after Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina; David S. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:17 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  In acquiescence to the District Court’s January, 2020 holding that the prohibition against Covered Entities charging for third party copies in the current regulations exceeded its statutory authority in Ciox Health, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
McDonalds was awarded £50,000 in damages (McDonalds did not seek its costs). [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]