Search for: "NORTH v. MCDONALD" Results 61 - 80 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
And looking ahead, Berman previews the anticipated opinion in “the biggest constitutional law case still pending” this Term, McDonald v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc, heard 12 – 13 February 2014. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:29 am by Alfred Brophy
 In re Moore, a 1976 decision in the North Carolina Supreme Court, quoted Buck v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am by Ilya Somin
Thomas' opinion reprises many of the arguments he made for this theory in his insightful concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:36 am by Paul Willetts
As widely reported in the media, McDonald’s CEO was fired for having a consensual relationship with an employee. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Louis (expanded)University of North Carolina at Charlotte (expanded)University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (expanded)University of Wyoming (expanded)Utrecht University (Universiteit Utrecht) (expanded)VID Specialized University (VID vitenskapelige høgskole)West Virginia University (expanded)Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWorld Anti-Doping Agency Closed Offices -- It is notoriously difficult to track Ombuds offices closing,… [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
  It is also one of the most common birds in North America. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am by Jocelyn Hutton, Matrix
L Batley Pet Products Limited v North Lanarkshire Council, heard 17 March 2014. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald discuss Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
McDonald's Issue: Whether, under the Lanham Act, Burger King met prudential standing requirements to bring a false advertising claim against McDonald's for fraud involved in various promotional games. [read post]