Search for: "NOTTINGHAM v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:41 pm
” United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:31 am
The Florida Supreme Court will review the Fifth District’s decision in LeDoux-Nottingham v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:30 am
Maynard , 80 F.3d 1433, 1448–50 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:13 pm
Mohammad Rizal Salim (The University of Nottingham Malaysia campus) has posted Are Legal Transplants Impossible? [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
United Kingdom and Al-Jedda v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:42 pm
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor [2018] UKSC 51 It is not every day you see the Supreme Court setting HMO licence conditions, but today is that day. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:27 am
Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) – Read judgment The high court has ruled that the coalition government’s cancellation of Labour’s school building program in 6 areas was unlawful. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 12:46 am
Before siding with Nacchio’s argument, the 10th Circuit’s decision explained how Nottingham adopted the majority decision in Mooney, (United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
The arguments were presumably stated in such a fashion to attract the attention of the Supreme Court to the case. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:49 am
Despite the need for general guidance on the legal principles in play in determining whether something constitutes a “building”, the relevant test is that laid down in Skerritts of Nottingham v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions [2000] JPL 1025 and as adopted in the Listed Buildings Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Chichvarkin & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 91 (10 February 2011) Walsh v Singh [2011] EWCA Civ 80 (10 February 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) YZ & Ors, R. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:50 am
Br. of Appellant, United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
On the Daubert issue, the only one on which the Court reverses the Nacchio verdict, it ironically relies on a case (Goebel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 (15 April 2008) London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 (15 April 2008) YB (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 360 (15 April 2008) High Court (Family Division) Nottingham City Council v G & Ors [2008] EWHC 540 (Fam) (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Office of Government Commerce… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
The courts were not able to come to a final decision on this point, however, the Supreme Court held that size, permanence and degree of annexation (the criteria established in Skerritts of Nottingham Limited v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (No 2) [2000] EWCA Civ 556) were relevant in determining whether an item falls under the statutory definition of ‘building’. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
In reaction to Nacchio’s attorney expressing surprise at the judge’s ruling to exclude the expert witness, Judge Nottingham stated in open court that if anyone would have told him that Nacchio’s attorneys would be surprised by his ruling, “you could have blown me over with a feather. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 12:12 am
Here's the abstract: This paper examines the overarching trends in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on questions of state jurisdiction in the sense of Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights and state responsibility, after its seminal judgment in the Al-Skeini case. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
Supreme Court JS (Sri Lanka), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 15 (17 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maga v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256 (16 March 2010) Agricullo Ltd v Yorkshire Housing Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 229 (16 March 2010) Joseph v Nettleton Road Housing Co-Operative Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 228 (16 March 2010) FN (Zimbabwe)… [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 11:03 pm
The agents who denied So, to the case of LB Camden v. [read post]
