Search for: "Naive v. Jones" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Did Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Scalia vote as they did in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
Not so said the Senior Costs Judge in Findley v Jones and MIB [2009] EWHC 90130 (Costs) (reaching the same conclusion as the judge in Puksis v Brumby [2008] EWHC 90095 (Costs)). [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
Consovoy counters that the court does not have to naively accept any and all draft legislation as indicative legitimate legislative purpose. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
Costello is an associate resident in the Atlanta office of Jones Day. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v Khoo (2018) EWHC 2296 (QB) (Not on Bailii for some reason. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
That law applies to rail workers; the issue also arises under the Jones Act, for seaman.  [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
McDonough, 126 S.Ct. 2096 (2006)........................7 Jones v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
" But in Black’s hands, the commitment to principles over politics is not a naive abstraction but a duty that comes with a constitutional blueprint. [read post]