Search for: "Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal (Fed. Cir. 2017)
27 Jun 2017, 8:46 pm by Patent Docs
But in the Nantkwest case, the Patent and Trademark Office asserted that it was entitled to recover attorneys' fees (and other expenses) regardless of... [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
NantKwest panel decision on USPTO attorneys’ fees goes en banc at CAFC
31 Aug 2017, 6:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The briefs should address the following issue: Did the panel in NantKwest, Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Attorney Fees: What is the meaning of “all expenses?”
31 Aug 2017, 10:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Issue: Did the panel in NantKwest, Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Patent Appeals to the District Court: Win or Lose, You Pay Attorneys’ Fees?
11 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
Recently, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appellate court that primarily hears appeals in patents cases) heard arguments in NantKwest Inc. v. [read post]
Duets Blog - http://www.duetsblog.com/
CAFC in Nantkwest: “[a]ll expenses of the proceedings” under § 145 includes the pro-rata share of the attorneys’ fees the USPTO incurred to defend applicant’s appeal.
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome Nantkwest v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Filing challenge to PTAB outcome in district court under § 145 will not incur attorneys' fees
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
NantKwest, Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
2019 IP In Review
19 Dec 2019, 12:26 pm by Olivia Cross
To explain, Brunetti was a follow-up to the Supreme Court’s Matal v. [read post]
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig Blog - https://www.dbllawyers.com/blog/