Search for: "Napier v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm by Jon Sands
US v Napier, 463 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir 2006) does not require it. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:23 am by NRF Digital Team
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:41 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:29 am by Steven Cohen
Napier used to come to his conclusions, except by stating that they consider it speculative. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 3:35 pm
The Supreme Court held that the LIA preempts state claims for injuries by both railroad passengers and rail workers in Napier v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
See In re Napier, 55 F.3d 610, 613 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Napier had held that the Locomotive Inspection Act (the relevant statute) imposed field preemption, wiping out all state authority, including tort claims, over, among other things, locomotive parts. [read post]